Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:28

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
To prevent ovarian cancers, fallopian tube removal is on the rise - statnews.com
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
When the mind leaves the body - scientists investigate the incredible phenomenon of OBEs - Earth.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Everything Apple Announced at WWDC 2025 - WIRED
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why is Nickelback known to be a bad band?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
BBC says it should have pulled livestream of rap group Bob Vylan over ‘antisemitism’ - AP News